The compromise of journalism standards

Yes, unfortunately it is true. Some journalists have and will continue to compromise their standards to get the story. It should not happen, but it does. Sure, we are all seeking the truth and we try to teach our students to do the same. However, often obstacles arise. In scholastic journalism, there are deadlines conflicting with other student activities, the lack of experience of some student journalists, and unfortunately prior review that seem to get in the way. Where does a student publication adviser start? I think it's critical to teach the importance of accuracy by simply showing examples of what happens when a journalist in not accurate. This needs to be the foundation of learning. Perhaps if we can train students to be concerned about accuracy first we can avoid problems in the future. As for the mirror versus the candle debate I think journalists need to be a combination of both. They need to shine the light in the corners and be the eyes for the audience they serve like the candle. They also need to reflect what is happening accepting that sometimes the information just needs to be sent and sent quickly for that matter. That's where  inaccuracy sometimes occurs. Let's face it there is the challenge of being fast and accurate. Too many times speed sacrifices clarity.